Let's Talk
Get a Free Quote
Let’s Talk

Build a Minimum Viable Product: The MVP Development Guide in 2025

Published On June 16th, 2025 6785Engineering
Get A Free Consultation

As an iterative approach, a minimum viable product (MVP) has been the starting point of many successful businesses.

Uber is a good example of how to leverage an MVP. Initially, the transportation giant focused on users booking limo rides within San Francisco. The founders capitalized on the positive response they received and went on to build the application it is today.

It’s not surprising that startups today are going the same route. Statistics say that 72% of startups follow the MVP approach.

Most startups and businesses opt for an experienced company offering MVP development services to create the initial version of their software idea.

There are innumerable benefits to building an MVP (which we’ll discuss later).

But the one that stands out is cost.

MVPs reduce development costs by 60%, which is advantageous for startups with limited budgets.

Now that you know how useful an MVP is, it’s time to dive deeper into the topic. Keep reading to learn how to build a minimum viable product, the advantages of an MVP, and more!

 
Achieve a 85% Success Rate with Your MVP. Learn How to Raise Funds Effectively!

What is MVP in Software Development & Why is It Important?

A minimum viable product is the most basic version of a software application that is released to the market. It offers the opportunity to collect user feedback with minimal financial requirements and resource usage.

Did you know that the MVP approach was introduced by Eric Ries, author of The Lean Startup?

As the name suggests, an MVP will have one feature or a set of features that will address the end user’s pain points.

 
 
 

Here’s an Example.

Etsy’s MVP took two and a half months to develop, and it was launched when eBay dominated the market. Founders Rob Kalin, Chris Maguire, and Haim Schoppik capitalized on eBay’s exorbitant seller fees, a common pain point among consumers at that time. Etsy eventually became eBay’s competitor. Current data says that Etsy has 95.5 million active buyers and 8.13 million active sellers.

Now, let’s dive into why building an MVP matters.

The Importance of a Minimum Viable Product in Software Development

An MVP acts as the entry point in the software development lifecycle (SDLC). Rather than building a complete product, businesses can release a stripped-down version featuring the core idea.

The investment required to build an MVP is minimal, and it can be launched in three to six months. The lower development costs and time benefit the SDLC.

An MVP also helps validate a product idea. It gives businesses real-time data on how their software meets the target audience’s expectations and the areas for improvement.

Risk reduction is another important feature of an MVP in software development. The data collected throughout the process is useful for businesses to gauge the marketability of the software.

Building an MVP comes with several benefits, which we’ll explore in the next section.

Top Benefits of a Minimum Viable Product for Startups

The benefits of an MVP include emphasis on core value proposition, reduced rework, building stronger customer relationships, and attention to other business functions.

Here are the advantages of an MVP.

✅ Focus on the Core Value Proposition

An MVP helps decide the software application’s value proposition. It showcases how the product will address the pain points of the target audience, giving businesses a clearer picture of their growth goals and the strategies to achieve them.

✅ Minimal Rework

During launch, the MVP will only have the core feature. This makes rework, if necessary, easy, as the time and resources required are minimal. As the MVP moves from one iteration to the next, newer and more advanced features will be added based on user feedback.

✅ Forging Stronger Customer Relationships

Early adopters are the biggest proponents of an MVP, as the product addresses their pain points. They are instrumental in marketing the app and building a supportive community around it. Additionally, the feedback they share is critical to the success of the application, both functionally and financially.

✅ Emphasis on Critical Business Functions

An MVP also evaluates the strengths of other components of a business, namely the marketing approach and the sales channel. With an MVP, businesses have actionable data on how effective their marketing approach is, which they can implement in future campaigns.

With that done, let’s take a look at how businesses can build an MVP.

How to Build a Minimum Viable Product(MVP)?

To build an MVP from scratch, start by researching the market you plan to enter and identify the problems faced by the target audience. Then, design the UI for a seamless user experience and plan the features to be included. Develop the MVP using the chosen tech stack and test it for bugs. Launch the MVP to the early adopters and follow the B-M-L loop to iterate and improve the application.

Let’s Take a Closer Look at the Key Steps Involved in Building a Minimum Viable Product:

1️⃣ Market Research

Market research takes precedence when building a minimum viable product. It helps identify the marketability of a product. Research also reveals important information about the competition in the specific domain, data that can contribute to the product’s success.

There are numerous methods to perform market research. One recommended approach is conducting surveys. Businesses should leverage tools like SurveyMonkey, Google Forms, Typeform, and SurveyPlanet to gain insights on domain-specific challenges.

By the end of this step, businesses will have a clear picture of the current status of the market they are planning to enter, which is vital to building an MVP that is functional and successful.

2️⃣ Define the Problem

This phase is all about questions and answers.

Questions like:

How does my product benefit the end user?

Would I buy the product as an end user?

How is my product different from the competitor’s?

It gives a fresh perspective in deciding the core feature(s) of the product.

The Jobs-to-be-Done approach can also be of help here. This customer-centric strategy puts the business in the end-user’s shoes to comprehend their requirements when they build an MVP.

Both methods are great at determining the unique value proposition (USP) of the product.

3️⃣ Design

A user-friendly design plays a significant role in the success of a software application. While designing User Interface (UI) and planning User Experience (UX), businesses should consider the end user’s point of view (POV).

From the moment they access the application, the end user must have a clear path to finding a solution to their issue. The design must assist in the execution of essential tasks the application is expected to complete, like making a purchase or accessing information.

4️⃣ Feature Prioritization

It’s important to not go overboard when determining the features to be added in the MVP. A minimum viable product will only have a few select features, or in some instances, a single core feature, giving it enough room to improve in the future.

Most businesses opt for the MoSCoW method to prioritize the features to be added.

M is for Must Have, features that must be included.

S is for Should Have, features that add value.

C is for Could Have, features that aren’t essential.

W is for Will Not Have, features that aren’t a priority.

5️⃣ MVP Development

A tech stack is chosen based on the requirements of the business. Selecting the right tech stack when building a minimum viable product is critical, as it will have an impact on the time to market, development costs, scalability, flexibility, and application performance and security.

The MVP goes into development once the tech stack is finalized and the necessary resources are allocated.

6️⃣ Testing and MVP Launch

As most dev teams follow the agile methodology, the MVP is regularly put through testing to find and eliminate bugs. The testing process also identifies usability and optimization issues.

After testing, the MVP is launched to a group of early adopters. The group usually consists of 40 to 50 individuals who have shown early interest in the MVP.

7️⃣ The B-M-L Loop

B-M-L stands for Build, Measure, Learn. It is an iterative process of developing an application and analyzing end-user data, and then using the data to improve the application. The goal is to learn what the target audience wants through multiple iterations.

After feedback analysis, the application goes into development again. The updated version is tested for bugs and released to the early adopters, and the entire process is repeated again. 

The application continues to evolve as it goes through multiple iterations, collecting user feedback and making optimizations wherever necessary.

 
Don’t Wait—Gain Access to Resources that Help you Build an MVP that Works Realtime

Launching an MVP? Avoid These 5 Developer Mistakes

Even the most innovative or groundbreaking app idea can fail if you don’t know what you shouldn’t do.

Meta’s founder, Mark Zuckerberg, is guilty of this. He has said that relying too much on HTML5 instead of native was the reason behind the failure of one of Facebook’s ventures.

Here Are Five Mistakes Those Investing in an MVP for Software Development Must Consider:

how to develop an mvp

Mistake #1: Insufficient Market Research

Comprehensive market research reveals insights that are beneficial to the MVP development process. The chances of failure are high when businesses build an MVP without sufficient market research.

Surface-level knowledge of your target audience and the market leads to overestimating market demand, overlooking competitors, and an inability to understand user requirements.

Mistake #2: Adding Too Many Features

An MVP is a barebones version of an application with a single core feature or a set of features. Some businesses go overboard by including features that aren’t essential to the core app idea (core value proposition).

The result is an application crammed with unnecessary features. Feature creep is counterproductive to SDLC, as it drags out the development process, uses additional resources, and takes the focus away from the core idea.

Mistake #3: Over-Implementing User Feedback

User feedback is a critical component of an MVP in software development. It provides valuable insights on the effectiveness of the MVP in handling the end user’s pain points and the optimizations required to improve its efficiency.

However, that doesn’t mean all feedback should be considered. It’s important to separate constructive feedback from the rest and work on it.

Feedback implementation is also a resource-intensive and time-consuming task. Modifying the app based on every single piece of feedback leads to development delays.

Mistake #4: Poor Outlook on App Future

Scalability and flexibility are two critical aspects of an MVP in software development. Businesses should be clear on the path the MVP will take, the features to be added, the potential challenges that may arise, and the resources required for development, maintenance, and support.

When businesses build an MVP without a planned outlook for the future, it can lead to undesirable outcomes. The app or the development process may switch tracks or completely derail without a proper framework in place.

Mistake #5: Choosing the Wrong Tech Stack

The tech stack is vital to the performance and scalability of the app. It also has a role to play in the development and maintenance costs. The wrong tech stack can lead to performance issues. It may even interfere with the ability to add new features.

The infamous “Twitter is over capacity” is a great example of choosing the wrong tech stack. Users received this message when Twitter’s servers were unable to handle the number of requests it receives.

Stop Wasting Money: 10 Questions to Ask Before Building Your Minimum Viable Product Development Plan

It’s the lean startup way to validate your idea without burning through your entire budget. 

But here’s the brutal truth: most MVPs fail. Why? Because they skip the crucial groundwork. They build something nobody wants. Ouch.

Before you write a single line of code (or spend a dime on development), you need to answer these 10 critical questions.

1️⃣ What Pain Point Are You Solving?

Is it a real, urgent problem — or just a “nice-to-have” feature?

2️⃣ Who Are Your Ideal Customers?

Be specific. Who will use your product, and why?

3️⃣ Is There Real Market Demand?

Do people actually need this, or are you guessing?

4️⃣ How Will You Measure Success?

What are your key metrics — user signups, engagement, revenue?

5️⃣ Who Are Your Competitors?

What’s already out there, and how are you different?

6️⃣ What’s Your Unique Selling Proposition (USP)?

Why should people choose your MVP over the rest?

7️⃣ Why Now?

What makes this the right time to build and launch?

8️⃣ What’s Your Go-to-Market Strategy?

How will you reach your audience and get traction?

9️⃣ What Are the Must-Have Features?

What’s absolutely essential to test your core idea?

🔟 Based on the Data, Should You Build This?

Be honest — does the research support moving forward?

Final Thoughts

Building an MVP is instrumental to the success of an application.

It gives businesses the ability to adapt based on user feedback and market trends, which is vital to the success of the business.

Scalability and marketability aside, the MVP approach in software development also helps businesses build solid relationships with their customers.

This is crucial in the current era of reviews and ratings.

While there are numerous benefits to a minimum viable product in software development, it is also important to avoid some of the common mistakes.

Overloading the MVP with too many features or opting for the wrong tech stack when building an MVP can cause more harm than good.

Also, remember to consult an MVP development company to test the validity of your app idea and build an MVP.

The resources at their disposal and their expertise in building scalable MVPs make these specialists a reliable option to partner with.

You cannot go wrong with the right MVP app development company.

Ready to Build an MVP?

Lokesh Kumar

Lokesh Kumar is a seasoned professional with a decade of experience in full stack development services. Passionate about innovation and technology trends, Lokesh thrives on bringing cutting-edge solutions to market.

60 Comments
  1. Klaus says:

    How do I plan for scaling after my Product at minimum viability is successful?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      Build scalable architecture from the start and monitor user metrics. Focus on strengthening infrastructure, optimizing UX, and planning feature rollouts aligned with user demand.

      Reply
  2. Andreas says:

    Is it possible to build an Product with minimum viability without coding skills?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      Absolutely! Platforms like Airtable, Webflow, or Adalo allow you to create Product with minimum viability without coding. They’re great for testing ideas and iterating quickly.

      Reply
  3. Dieter says:

    How do I avoid overbuilding when creating an Minimally viable product?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      Stay disciplined. Define a clear problem and develop only the essential features. Regularly revisit your goals to ensure alignment with the core purpose.

      Reply
  4. Johannes says:

    What is the best development methodology to create an Minimally viable product?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      Agile development is ideal. It emphasizes quick iterations, user involvement, and continuous improvement, making it perfect for Minimally viable product development for startups.

      Reply
  5. Thomas says:

    How do I gather user feedback effectively after launching an Product at its minimum viable state?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      Use tools like Hotjar for behavioral analytics, Typeform for surveys, and social media platforms to directly engage users. Their feedback will guide iterations.

      Reply
  6. Stefan says:

    Can you explain how to build an Minimum version of a viable product that attracts investors?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      Showcase real traction. Build a minimum viable product with data-driven results—early adoption rates, user feedback, and proof that it solves a key problem. This builds investor confidence.

      Reply
  7. Wilhelm says:

    What type of team should I hire for minimum feature set development services?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      Look for a team experienced in Agile methodologies with expertise in minimum feature set development. They should understand how to iterate quickly and focus on user feedback to refine the product.

      Reply
  8. Friedrich says:

    How do I prioritize features when developing A product with minimum viable features for startups?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      Use the MoSCoW method: categorize features as Must Have, Should Have, Could Have, and Won’t Have. Focus only on Must-Have features that solve your core problem.

      Reply
  9. Karl says:

    What’s the most cost effective way to create an Minimum version of a viable product without coding?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      Use no-code tools like Bubble, Glide or Zapier to build Minimum version of a viable product prototypes. These platforms allow you to test functionality and gather feedback without the expense of custom development.

      Reply
  10. Hans says:

    How do I ensure I’m solving the right problem when I build A product that is minimally viable?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      Focus on user validation. Talk to potential customers, conduct surveys & analyze their pain points. Start with a single problem your Product at its minimum viable state solves effectively and refine it based on feedback.

      Reply
  11. Felix says:

    How can I scale my startup after successfully building an Minimum Feature Set?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      After creating a minimum viable product focus on scaling by improving infrastructure, adding features users request and optimizing for growth. Developing an MVP first allows startups to iterate effectively and expand smartly.

      Reply
  12. Becker says:

    Should I develop an Minimally viable product from scratch or use no-code tools?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      If your startup idea is unique build a minimum viable product from scratch. If not use no-code platforms like Webflow to save time and money. Building an Minimally viable product this way allows faster testing and iteration.

      Reply
  13. Emilia says:

    How do I gather user feedback after creating an Minimum version of a viable product?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      Once you build an Minimum version of a viable product use tools like Hotjar and Typeform to gather user feedback. Social media & direct conversations are great ways to understand how users interact with your minimum viable product and what improvements they need.

      Reply
  14. Wagner says:

    How can building a minimum viable product help me attract investors?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      Investors love startups that create a minimum viable product with real user feedback. Building an Product at minimum viability shows traction, validates your idea and proves there’s demand making it easier to secure funding.

      Reply
  15. Leon says:

    How can I avoid common mistakes while developing an Minimum Feature Set for my startup?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      When you develop an Minimally viable product focus on solving a real problem, don’t skip prototyping & prioritize features. Use Lean or Agile methods to avoid scope creep ensuring your minimum viable product stays efficient & effective.

      Reply
  16. Weber says:

    What tools can I use to build a minimum viable product without coding?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      Use no code platforms like Bubble for web apps or Adalo for mobile apps to create an MVP without coding. These tools are perfect for startups looking to build an MVP quickly & affordably.

      Reply
  17. Hannah says:

    Are there examples of startups that succeeded by building an MVP?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      Absolutely! Spotify built an MVP focusing on playing local music files while Zappos created a minimum viable product using photos of store bought shoes. Building an MVP helped them validate demand and grow.

      Reply
  18. Fischer says:

    How can I validate my idea before I build A product that is minimally viable?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      To validate your idea for building a minimum viable product, conduct surveys, create landing pages & use tools like Google Forms. Engage potential users to ensure your Product at minimum viability solves a real problem saving you time and resources.

      Reply
  19. Maximilian says:

    What’s the best way to identify key features when building an Minimum Feature Set Product?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      To build a minimum viable product focus on solving one specific problem. Use the MoSCoW method to prioritize features and ensure that your Minimum Feature Set Product delivers maximum value without overcomplicating development.

      Reply
  20. Lukas says:

    How can I start to build A product with minimum viable features without coding experience?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      To build A product with minimum viable features without code use tools like Bubble, Glide or Webflow. These platforms allow you to create a minimum viable product quickly focusing on your idea’s core functionality without needing to write any code.

      Reply
  21. Livia says:

    How do I create an Minimum version of a viable product that evolves with user needs?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      To create a minimum viable product that evolves focus on iterative development. Continuously gather feedback, analyze user behavior and update features. Developing an Minimum version of a viable product this way ensures startups adapt to market changes and user expectations.

      Reply
  22. Victor says:

    What are some real world examples of successful Minimally viable product?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      Companies like Spotify and Zappos started by building simple Minimum Feature Set Product’s. Spotify created a minimum viable product focused on local music playback. These examples highlight how startups can build an MVP that solves one problem effectively.

      Reply
  23. Flavia says:

    How do I scale after creating an Minimum Feature Set Product that gains traction?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      To scale your Minimum Feature Set Product strengthen backend systems and expand your feature set based on feedback. Building an Product at its minimum viable state for startups means planning for growth from day one while iterating the product to meet user demands.

      Reply
  24. Magnus says:

    What steps should I follow to build an Minimum Feature Set product that attracts investors?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      When you create a minimum viable product include real world user feedback and success metrics. Investors are drawn to MVPs that demonstrate validated demand. Building an Minimum Feature Set Product for startups with clear results increases your chances of securing funding.

      Reply
  25. Serena says:

    How can I avoid building an Product at minimum viability that fails to attract users?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      To avoid failure focus on solving one core problem effectively. Building an Product at minimum viability for startups requires validating the market need before adding features. Use lean principles & Agile methods to develop an Product at minimum viability that users actually need.

      Reply
  26. Octavius says:

    How can I gather user feedback while building A product with minimum viable features?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      To gather feedback while building a minimum viable product use tools like Hotjar or Google Forms. Engaging with users directly helps you iterate your Minimum version of a viable product. For startups this feedback loop ensures you are creating an Minimum Feature Set that aligns with market needs.

      Reply
  27. Valeria says:

    What’s the process to develop an Product with minimum viability on a tight startup budget?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      To develop an Product with minimum viability on a limited budget leverage no code platforms and test prototypes. Create an Minimally viable product without coding to validate ideas quickly. This approach helps startups build a minimum viable product without incurring high development costs.

      Reply
  28. Lucius says:

    How do I prioritize features when developing A product that is minimally viable?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      When building a minimum viable product use frameworks like MoSCoW to decide which features are “Must-Have.” Focus on solving the core problem as this ensures your Minimally viable product resonates with users while keeping the development lean.

      Reply
  29. Cassia says:

    What are the best tools to create an Minimum Feature Set without coding?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      To create a minimum viable product without coding, use platforms like Bubble, Glide or Webflow. These tools allow you to develop an Minimum Feature Set quickly and cost effectively making them perfect for building an Minimally viable product for startups on a budget.

      Reply
  30. Aurelius says:

    How do I start to build an Minimum version of a viable product without over complicating it?

    Reply
    1. Ram Narayanan says:

      To build an Minimum version of a viable product effectively focus on understanding the core user problem. Start small by identifying pain points and validate your idea with simple tools or surveys. This way you can build or can create a minimum viable product that solves real problems for startups.

      Reply
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *